Prediction of Kristin Godridge vs Ruth Seeman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
K. Godridge vs R. Seeman

Kristin Godridge

HKG

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ruth Seeman

NZL

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Godridge 1 - 1 Seeman

They have played 4 sets in total, with Kristin Godridge winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 2. The last match between Ruth Seeman and Kristin Godridge was at the ITF Newcastle, 06-03-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Ruth Seeman getting the victory 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Godridge	1
Seeman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Newcastle(03-06-89)

Stats

Ruth Seeman

Kristin Godridge

(R3) ITF Canberra(03-07-88)

Stats

Kristin Godridge

Ruth Seeman

K. Godridge vs R. Seeman H2H Profile

K. Godridge	Stats	R. Seeman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.42% (145-137)	Career Total W/L	49.65% (70-71)
1	Grass	1
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

K. Godridge vs R. Seeman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kristin Godridge has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kristin Godridge, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Kristin Godridge has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruth Seeman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Kristin Godridge has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ruth Seeman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Kristin Godridge has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 79/61), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 31% (W/L 9/20). Ruth Seeman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
Player level: In the last year, Kristin Godridge has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ruth Seeman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kristin Godridge winning 1 times and Ruth Seeman being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kristin Godridge winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 2.
The last match between Kristin Godridge and Ruth Seeman was at the ITF Newcastle, 06-03-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Ruth Seeman getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kristin Godridge has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ruth Seeman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kristin Godridge has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruth Seeman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Kristin Godridge has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruth Seeman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Kristin Godridge vs Ruth Seeman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Godridge vs R. Seeman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

K. Godridge	Stats	R. Seeman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
21	Games Won	20
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

K. Godridge Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wilmington 50K - 15-07-1996
R3 Catherine BarclayC. Barclay	L	4-3 RET	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1996
R1 Helena SukovaH. Sukova	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Eastbourne - 18-06-1996
Q1 Melanie SchnellM. Schnell	L	6-3 3-6 6-2	Stats
Birmingham - 10-06-1996
R2 Gloria PizzichiniG. Pizzichini	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Roland Garros - 27-05-1996
R1 Karina HabsudovaK. Habsudova	L	6-7(5) 6-0 7-5	Stats

View All

R. Seeman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wellington - 04-02-1991
Q3 Miriam OremansM. Oremans	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	W	6-2 0-1 RET	Stats
Q1 Ann DevriesA. Devries	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Auckland - 28-01-1991
Q1 Petra SchwarzP. Schwarz	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Milan - 23-07-1990
R3 Magdalena SimkovaM. Simkova	L	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

K. Godridge vs R. Seeman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

K. Godridge	Stats	R. Seeman
51.42% (145/137)	YTD Win/Loss	49.65% (70/71)
51.78% (335/312)	Sets Win/Loss	48.92% (158/165)
50.66% (2977/2900)	Games Win/Loss	50.08% (1474/1469)
56.43% (79/61)	Hard Win/Loss	49.25% (33/34)
47.54% (29/32)	Clay Win/Loss	52.78% (19/17)
66.67% (12/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
47.06% (16/18)	Grass Win/Loss	55.00% (11/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
355.98	Average Opponent Rank	415.16
42.11% (8/11)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
63.16% (60/35)	Challenger W/L	54.55% (42/35)
31.03% (9/20)	Futures W/L	16.67% (1/5)
52% (144/278)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (66/135)
50% (9/18)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	22% (2/9)
48% (43/89)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (25/50)
83% (148/123)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (65/51)
17% (148/25)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (65/13)
17% (132/22)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (73/15)